Evidence Hub
ADDRESSING MYTHS ABOUT CSE
A repository of evidence-based responses to common false and misleading claims about CSE.
| Concern | Response | Evidence | Stakeholders |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Doesn’t exposing children to this type of content encourage them to engage in more risky sexual behaviour?” | Age-appropriate CSE protects, it does not provoke. International evidence consistently shows delayed not increased first sexual activity, and better recognition of and response to abuse, following exposure to CSE. | The YPAR finds that CSE generally wielded positive outcomes for young people. This included increased levels of confidence in the ability to say “no” to sex and sexual advances, to report cases of abuse, to buy and use condoms, to negotiate sexual activity. For example, youth in Uganda reported that CSE teaches valuable life skills. One out-of-school male youth reported that “they teach us about our rights, testing for HIV, [and] how to make decisions… like using condoms”. | Community leaders Faith leaders Parents |
| “Isn’t this a foreign idea that doesn’t reflect our culture and values?” | National CSE curricula are developed and contextually adapted by national ministries, not imposed from outside. In many cases the best-resourced anti-CSE campaigns are themselves foreign-funded and foreign-led. | The YPAR research found that several multi-sectoral frameworks exist to implement SRHR-related commitments in all three countries. In Malawi, policy aims to bring together government departments of education, health, and youth developments to ensure enhanced access to SRHR. In Ethiopia, policy mandates collaboration between the health and education sectors to manage the governance of CSE and SRHR-related access. In Uganda, robust policy frameworks guide the roles of government ministries of sport, education, and health. | Community leaders Faith leaders Parents Govt officials CSOs |
| “Doesn't this take away my role as a parent, or undermine our faith?” | CSE is designed as a partnership with parents and communities, which should reinforce not replace their role. Families remain central to how young people learn responsibility and healthy relationships. | In Malawi, YPAR findings showed that when youth were exposed to CSE, they were more likely to follow advice from teachers and parents, not take away from their authority. In addition, YPAR findings show that when youth did attempt to speak with their parents, aunts, or uncles, they felt shame and were sometimes silenced indicating that youth express a desire to communicate on these topics. | Parents |
| “Does CSE push beliefs about gender and relationships that go against my values?" | CSE’s content is age-appropriate health, safety and relationship-skills education grounded in each country’s own national curriculum. It is not a vehicle for a separate, externally driven identity agenda, and its stated purpose is protection from HIV, pregnancy and abuse. | YPAR research shows positive findings that CSE is an important factor for achieving improved sexual and reproductive health. This extends to young person’s developing a sense of agency with increased ability to make informed, safe, healthy decisions about their sexual lives which could in turn decrease STIs and incidents of rape or sexual assault. | Faith leaders Community leaders Govt officials |
| “Doesn't this go against authentic African or traditional values?" | CSE reinforces values of care, protection and responsibility that families, faiths and traditions in these countries already hold. Traditional leaders are framed as partners in delivering that protection, not obstacles to it. | The research found that in each of the countries, the relevant policy frameworks that govern CSE recognise the important role of communities and multi-stakeholder engagement. This includes mothers’ groups and parents in Malawi, youth and cultural clubs in Ethiopia, and local community leaders and families in Uganda. | Community leaders Faith leaders |
FAQs
Common questions, straight answers